6 found
Order:
  1. Aquinas on the Immateriality of the Intellect.David Ruel Foster - 1991 - The Thomist 55 (3):415-438.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  27
    Aquinas’s Arguments for Spirit.David Ruel Foster - 1991 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 65:235-252.
  3.  38
    Nature’s Causes.David Ruel Foster - 1997 - Review of Metaphysics 51 (1):142-143.
    Richard Connell’s book brings together Aristotle’s great metaphysical insight, that everything has four causes, with the discoveries of modern natural science. Whereas many contemporary philosophers and natural scientists think the question of the nature and number of causes is irrelevant or resolved, Connell thinks that they are indispensable distinctions that have been mauled beyond recognition.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  14
    God and Subjectivity. [REVIEW]David Ruel Foster - 1993 - Review of Metaphysics 46 (4):845-846.
    Galgan wants to write a biography of being, and the character witnesses are Aristotle, Anselm, Descartes, and Feuerbach. The main points are that Anselm is a pivot between a classical and modern view of God in first philosophy, and that modern philosophers gave up the search for God by claiming to have found God to be man. Thus God was replaced by subjectivity--our subjectivity. The book is not a textual study, but does give a fairly close commentary on texts of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  24
    The Philosophy of Nature of St. Thomas Aquinas. [REVIEW]David Ruel Foster - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 52 (3):674-676.
  6.  5
    The Philosophy of Nature of St. Thomas Aquinas. [REVIEW]David Ruel Foster - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 52 (3):674-676.
    The most striking feature of Leo Elders’s book is the broad context with which he surrounds Thomas’s doctrine of nature. For example, his discussion of the soul provides a good review of the doctrine before and after Thomas, his discussion of “time” takes us from Parmenides to Einstein. Because Elders wants to refute those who think the doctrine of Thomas is simply of historical interest, he consistently relates Thomas’s teaching to the contemporary state of the question. He does a credible (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark